Remote Training with BrainMaster Thomas F. Collura, Ph.D. BrainMaster Technologies, Inc.pdf

Remote Training Flow Chart BrainMaster 2.0 with Session Librarian.pdf

The Realities of Remote Neurofeedback Tom and Terri Collura BrainMaster Technologies, Inc.pdf

Neurofeedback Practicum – Remote Training. (2 HRS) Thomas Collura, PhD.pdf

Disclaimer: The content below was generated with the assistance of AI and then reviewed and edited by BrainMaster Technologies, Inc. It is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice.

Summary #

This document outlines the clinical, operational, and logistical considerations required to implement remote EEG neurofeedback systems in home, school, and workplace settings. It highlights the need for clinician supervision, quality assurance, and simplified user workflows to make remote delivery safe, scalable, and cost-effective.

Clinical Requirements for Remote Neurofeedback #

Remote neurofeedback involves deploying EEG equipment outside the clinic while maintaining clinician oversight. Key points include:

1. Necessity of Clinical Supervision #

• EEG neurofeedback equipment is considered a prescription device, requiring responsible clinician oversight.

• Clinicians remain accountable for training quality and outcomes regardless of location.

• Remote systems must provide clinicians with reliable access to session data, behavioral notes, and progress indicators.

2. Avoiding Unsupervised Self-Therapy #

The document stresses that remote programs should not depend on clients or parents acting as de facto therapists. Instead, systems must be designed to ensure usability and compliance while minimizing user error.

Operational and Workflow Considerations #

1. Simplicity and Control #

Effective remote systems must:

• Allow clinicians to pre-define protocols and parameters.

• Ensure trainees can only perform approved training activities.

• Automatically capture and transmit session duration, reward metrics, EEG parameters, and self-reports.

2. Asynchronous vs. Real-Time Monitoring #

The authors argue that real-time live monitoring is not strictly necessary. Instead, reliable data sharing—combined with periodic communication—can sufficiently support remote programs.

3. Increasing Access & Reducing Burden #

Remote systems can help clinicians manage more clients (20–40 increasing to 100+), reduce labor demands, and expand geographic reach.

Economic Implications #

1. Cost Reduction for Clients #

Transitioning from ~40 in-office visits to a hybrid model can reduce total costs from $2,000–$4,000 to approximately $500–$1,000, broadening accessibility.

2. Scalable Business Models #

The paper outlines the potential for:

• Equipment rental or leasing

• Subscription-based remote plans ($100–$300/month)

• New revenue streams via remote supervision and assessment

Technical Requirements for Effective Remote Systems #

1. Protocol Deployment #

Clinicians need the ability to design protocols on one system and deploy them to another via simple means (e.g., email, removable media, internet).

2. Data Transfer #

Systems must allow easy transfer of:

• Session metrics

• EEG amplitude data

• Reward data

• Behavioral/self-report information

3. Fail-Safe User Limitations #

Remote trainees must be constrained to the clinician-defined features and prevented from modifying thresholds, protocols, or settings.

Future Vision for Remote Neurofeedback #

The authors foresee a ten-fold increase in home/school/office EEG usage driven by:

• Lower hardware costs (sub-$1,000 options)

• Streamlined clinician oversight

• Reduced in-clinic time

• Broader adoption through affordability and accessibility